Photo by TayebMEZAHDIA on Pixabay

Indonesia’s politics have experienced significant changes over the past few decades, evolving from a system characterized by authoritarian rule to a more democratic structure. The political landscape in Indonesia is shaped by multiple factors, including religion, patronage politics, and the historical context of the country. This article offers a comprehensive analysis of Indonesia’s political situation, paying particular attention to the emergence of political polarization and the challenges it presents to the nation’s democratic institutions.

The Foundations of Indonesia’s Political System

Indonesia’s Democratic Evolution

Since the fall of Suharto’s New Order regime, Indonesia has been on a journey toward becoming a full-fledged democracy. The political system is now characterized by popular sovereignty, with parliamentary and presidential elections held every five years. While these elections are generally considered free and fair, the country still faces issues related to corruption, nepotism, and money politics.

The Role of Religion

Religion, particularly Islam, plays a significant role in Indonesia’s politics. The Islamic pluralist divide is a key aspect of the political landscape, with parties and politicians often aligning themselves with either Islamic or pluralist principles. This divide can be traced back to the nation’s pre-independence period when political movements mobilized around the role of religion in the state.

Trias Politica: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches

Indonesia’s political system is built on the concept of trials politica, which separates power among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. The current administration, led by President Joko Widodo, has been in office since 2014 and will govern until the next elections in 2024.

The Emergence of Political Polarization in Indonesia

A Shift in Indonesia’s Political Landscape

Indonesia has experienced a notable increase in political polarization since 2014, with the Islamic pluralist divide becoming more pronounced. This development has been particularly evident during the 2014 presidential election, the 2017 Jakarta gubernatorial election, and the 2019 presidential election. The competition between President Joko Widodo and his former opponent, Prabowo Subianto, has ignited tensions between Islamists and pluralists in Indonesia’s politics. To the recent news, emerging more favorably yet undoubtedly rising in popularity Anies R. Baswedan, former Indonesian Capital Governor, has been posed and deemed challenged by others in contestation.

Factors Driving Political Polarization

Several societal and political forces have contributed to the growing polarization in Indonesia’s politics. Patronage-driven politics, which incentivize politicians to collaborate across ideological lines in pursuit of state resources, have continued to play a role in shaping the political landscape. Additionally, the leadership style of former president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who prioritized stability and compromise over conflict, contributed to a lack of polarization during his time in office.

The Impact of Political Polarization on Indonesia’s Democracy

Challenges to Democratic Institutions

There’s an idea that the increasing polarization in Indonesia’s politics poses a threat to the country’s democratic institutions. However, as the Islamic pluralist divide becomes more salient, it has the potential to undermine the stability and functioning of the political system. With the growth of three potential Presidential candidates, Islamic fundamentalists tend to favor Anies R. Baswedan as their potential elected President, rather than other candidates. The last Presidential Election in 2019 proves that Prabowo has further distanced himself from his main follower, by neglecting essential issues related to Islamic Fundamentalists stakeholders. Furthermore, the growing divide may also exacerbate social tensions and contribute to a more divided society.

The Role of Patronage Politics

Despite the challenges presented by political polarization, patronage politics continue to play a role in blunting ideological divides in Indonesia. The pursuit of state resources incentivizes politicians to cooperate across ideological lines, which can help to mitigate some of the tensions associated with polarization. However, this dynamic also weakens democratic accountability and may contribute to ongoing issues related to corruption and nepotism.

The Future of Indonesia’s Politics

Navigating Political Polarization

As Indonesia’s political landscape continues to evolve, the nation will need to find ways to navigate the challenges posed by increased polarization. Addressing the underlying issues that drive political divisions, such as corruption and patronage politics, will be crucial to fostering a more stable and inclusive political system.

Strengthening Democratic Institutions

In recent news lately, President Joko Widodo make a very clear standpoint to daddle in the next Presidential Election, “Cawe-Cawe” or meddling in the system in pursuit of the greater good of the nation was a statement that has made difficult for others to believe the next Presidential Election will be running in fair and objective without intervention. People in the Republic of Indonesia also has been shocked due to the recent appeal at MK in the Election Method, which was previously Open Proportional to become Closed Proportional. It is with great effort since Soeharto’s regime fell, the Reformation process was to ensure Indonesian people knew whose they are choosing, instead of choosing Political Party(s). Expert(s) in a Political standpoint has made critics both in media social or online news media, trying to explore the possibilities should the Election Method is really returning back to Closed Proportional.

To secure the future of Indonesia’s democracy, efforts must be made to strengthen the nation’s democratic institutions. This may involve implementing reforms to promote greater transparency, accountability, and public participation in the political process, as well as addressing the ongoing challenges related to corruption and nepotism. Citizen journalism is also encouraged to be the party that balanced and checks for the Government in the media social and imposes constructive ideas and critics for this upcoming election to be fair and just.

Conclusion

The evolving political landscape in Indonesia presents both challenges and opportunities for the nation’s democracy. While the increasing polarization has the potential to undermine democratic institutions and social cohesion, it also offers a chance for Indonesia to address the root causes of these divisions and work towards a more inclusive and accountable political system. By understanding the complexities of Indonesia’s politics and taking steps to strengthen democratic institutions, the country can continue on its path toward a more stable and prosperous future.

Indonesia’s politics, political polarization, Islamic-pluralist divide, patronage politics, democratic institutions